Wednesday, August 16, 2017

I'm Thinking YES.

Was The Charlottesville Riot A Set-Up?

The first item worth noting in this tragedy is that the organizer, Jason Kessler, appears to be an equal opportunity provocateur
More like a false flag interloper, working with the Left.

RTWT, There.

Micro-Aggressions Get Promoted to New Status

Professors advised to treat racial microaggressions in classrooms like assault
I recall clearly that being white is a micro-aggression, and that even if a white renounces his/her privilege, then s/he is a liar as well as an aggressor. After all, whites cannot get rid of their privilege, because, well it's obvious: they are white, and therefore have privilege.

So being white is now an assault on non-whites. I suppose that a deep tan (or orange) doesn't absolve the sin of whiteness. And blue eyes and/or blond hair, well you might as well stand up against the wall and wait for Antifa to figure out their weapons.

Meanwhile, Back in Iran...

The Iranian Parliament Chanted 'Death to America' while voting more cash for missiles.
No doubt using the plane-load of cash sent to them by Obama...

The Establishment Draws Its Line

The Marxist culture war has now produced the enemy which the (nearly, if not totally) entire establishment political structure can join in hating: white "supremacists". The Marxists have been successful in Charlottesville by the tactic of attracting the entire spectrum of the population which wishes to defend the historical markers, and in fact, the history of the USA as a nation. The Left cannot tolerate the statues which honor their own heroes: the artifacts of the Democrat Secession and Civil War to protect Democrat-owned slavery of blacks.

The gathering at Charlottesville has been declared to be White Supremacist. And included in the group were, indeed, some white supremacists. But not all. The term "White Supremacist" is now the pejorative applied to all who are not Marxist Progressives.

So the official Oppressor Class in the Marxist Three Class system of class war has been named: we are all to be known as White Supremacists.

I have little doubt that the term, "fascist", will be competing with the term, "white supremacist", as the holy warriors of the "Alt Left" (new term thanks to Trump) continue to weaponize to beat and maim protestors and bystanders they deem beneath themselves.

Here's a prediction: sooner or later the Right will false-flag the Antifas by dressing up in all black and attacking from behind and within the Antifa population. Does that qualify as 4th gen warfare?

Here's another thought: Now that the entire political structure is anti-Trump, he might have to go third party in 2020. If that split happens there is a decent chance of the Democrats electing a psycho, say Pocahontas Warren, and the hammer coming down on the rest of us.

It's important to note the elevation of Antifa and its violence to the status of moral heroes who are fighting racism (white supremacy). Antifa will likely garner more members due to the messianic savior image it is receiving from politicians, MSM, and celebs. Antifa could morph into the equivalent of the Red Army in Russia's communist revolution assault on humanity. We already have the Lenins, Trotskys, and are just awaiting our Stalin. With the universities, corporations and much of the military already converged, and with Trump on the ropes, nothing can be surprising anymore.

Charlottesville demonstrations: Law profs say white society at large bears responsibility
It's always the same for these folks: whites are evil.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

I Won't Give Wal*Mart Any Business If I Can Help It

Walmart's Doug McMillon lectures Trump about "White Supremacists". Not BLM. Not Antifa. Not Marxist culture warriors calling for genocide of whites. Walmart's Doug is taking offense at whites who were attacked by Antifa. Walmart has gone arrogantly Leftist, blaming whites for the Antifa/BLM violence.

Walmart seems to think that it will not lose customers, just as Target thought. Walmart has lost me. Amazon has everything I need, possibly including groceries except maybe perishables. Dollar stores are popping up like convenience stores. There are sufficient local groceries.

Walmart's racism against whites is fully in line with the Democrat's position on eliminating whites from politics, at least in the party of Donks. The morality of anti-white racism is spreading like wildfire. Whites will take the blame for Antifa's violence, BLM murders, and all sorts of reversed logic assaults on the USA. Walmart and Google: two of a kind, different markets, same arrogant bullshit.

Prof Claims Criticism = Repression

Professor: Journalism, outrage over academics’ provocative statements is ‘technique of repression’
Don't criticize US! You Oppressors, you! We'll call for your genocide without any lip from you!

IowaHawk Still at the Top of his Game

Boom! Iowahawk obliterates Markos Moulitsas’ shameful Charlottesville spin with 1 tweet
Savor it there...

Jeff Goldstein, on Alt Right

I told you all before and I'll repeat it now: the alt right is not conservative, and it is every bit as driven by identity politics and blood essentialism as the prog left.

Antifa, BLM, CAIR, the New Black Panthers, La Raza, the Pussy Hatters, the KKK -- these are all identity movements and all formed and animated by the kind of identity politics championed by the left, and legitimated by the likes of Edward Said and other academic cultural Marxists who recognized the way to power was to divide, and then control, particular identity groups, whose narratives they seek to create and police.

The alt-right is only "right wing" in the continental sense. The American conservative is classically liberal, while the American progressive is Fabian socialist.

Don't listen to labels; follow the assumptions made by each movement -- the alt right, the prog left -- and you'll soon recognize that they are the same. This is tribalism, no more and no less. And when tribes are at odds, they clash over territory -- be it physical territory or political power. What we are witnessing is an attempt to corrupt the ideals of a propositional nation based on individualism and individual universal rights (and that's how our Constitutional republic is designed to operate) -- a lesson Google's pillorying of a software engineer as "anti-diversity" should have made clear. Intolerance is a hallmark of every authoritarian movement. Simply pretending some intolerance is more noble, which is affected by self-servingly dismissing dissenters as purveyors of "hate," is a ham-fisted surrender to anti-intellectual sophistry.

You should reject this archaic collectivism from whatever group espouses it, because in the end it is simply anti-individualism dressed in mob attire to bolster cowardice and bigotry in numbers.

You were warned.
Anti-intellectual sophistry, eh? In the face of actual, documented, daily hate? Jeff: are you impaired in some data input manner?

The inability to determine content seems endemic to these apologists who insist that the Alt-Right is merely identity. Of course it is identity! Buckley conservatism is an identity. RINO is an identity. Antifa is an identity. BLM is an identity. The Alt-Right was assigned its own identity, and named itself.

Today the Left has assigned everyone to an identity, usually with a false proposition for a name. For example, Antifa is actually fascist, communist and socialist. The Democrat National Committee is anti-white, and therefore black-power as their identity. The Republicans are inept, and that's their identity. Humans with testicles are male: that's their identity regardless of any of their claims to the contrary. If you don't recognize your identity, you are an underground dweller.

Some identities want full control over the other identities. That is the main thrust of assigning identities in the first place - Marxist Class War requires it. And that is what this "culture war" has devolved into: war for control of all aspects of everyone's lives. Google wants it. Facebook wants it. Antifa wants it. The BLM/DNC wants it.

The Alt-Right wants to be left alone. But its identity is "NOT Leftist, fascist, communist or other socialist". This tribalism has been forced on them. The Alt-right found its tribe the hard way. Conservatives as a tribe are actually Leftist toadies. Traditional liberalism became the Alt-Right (which is why it is defamed as White Nationalism).

So they cannot be left alone, under the rules of engagement in place by the Left (fascists, communists and other socialists). And they are forced to act in order to thwart their marginalization/enslavement into Re-Education camps.

Ignore THAT at your own peril, Goldstein.

The Ignoranti Speak

Brendan O'Neill shows the lack of comprehension that afflicts mugwumps, RINOS and the ignoranti:
It's becoming so clear now why the war of words between SJWs and the new white nationalists is so intense. It isn't because they have huge ideological differences -- it's because they have so much in common. Both are obsessed with race, SJWs demanding white shame, the alt-right responding with white pride. Both view everyday life and culture through a highly racialised filter. SJWs can't even watch a movie without counting how many lines the black actor has in comparison with the white actor so that they can rush home and tumblr about the injustice of it all. Both have a seemingly boundless capacity for self-pity. Both are convinced they're under siege, whether by patriarchy, transphobia and the Daily Mail (SJWs) or by pinkos and blacks (white nationalists). Both have a deep censorious strain. And both crave recognition of their victimhood and flattery of their feelings. This is really what they're fighting over -- not principles or visions but who should get the coveted title of the most hard-done-by identity. They're auditioning for social pity. "My life matters! My pain matters! I matter!" The increasing bitterness and even violence of their feud is not evidence of its substance, but the opposite: it's the narcissism of small differences.
"...not principles or visions..."? That is the most inaccurate statement which could possibly be made. If he believes it, then he is a fool. As the Left continues to deny venues to speech other than their own racist, fascist, violent eliminationist rhetoric - now focused on all whites - the necessary reaction to that is not an audition "for social pity". And to state that it is, is inexplicable except due to unconscionable ineptness of observation.

The Left's tactics go far beyond denial of venue, and include brutality at events of the Right, from Trump rallies to the rally to stop the destruction of Democrat history in the south. Antifa needn't schedule events nor obtain permits: they go to the meetings of the Other and bring mayhem, fire, bloody attacks - which are abetted by the police, usually by "standing down" (hell, just go home, cops!), or by actively forcing the Other into the weaponry of the antifa goons. Afterwards, the antifa rioting and brutality is blamed on Trump, of course, as the Leftist MSM and politicians cover for their nouveau-KKK.

But as for O'Neill, if he gets caught up in an actual culture war fray it won't be the Right that cold-cocks him. It will be antifa terrorists purging the world for Leftism and the lies the Left believes.

Yale Responds to Dilbert; Ross McKitrick Dissects

Dilbert Cartoon on Climate Change Prompts Rebuttal from Yale
The problem is this: they prove Dilbert's case.

While reading through this and summoning up some of the reference papers I came across the issue of Hockey Sticks, Red Noise, and the MBH98/99 data transformation used by certain, if not all, climate modellers. To summarize the MBH98/99 issue, applying the MBH98/99 data transformation to the actual virgin data: when MHB98 is applied to red noise, a hockey stick is produced. Further, data used by various modellers is claimed to be open to the public, but is not and requests for the data are consistently refused. Selection bias for data sources is rampant, using only data sources such as provide presupposed data trends (bristle cone pines), and ignoring others (ice core). The Arctic-melt warming is headlined while the ice increase in the Antarctic is ignored. Sea level is still claimed to be radically rising (with flood photos injected as false proof)... the sea level has not risen, because the Antarctic ice build-up has frozen the water lost by the Arctic and glaciers. Further, the warming that exists has caused extra plant growth, which sequesters both carbon and water.

The Michael Mann [1] MHB98 data transform should be sufficient to disqualify all models which use it.

Dilbert is right. As usual.

Note 1: Amazon: "A Disgrace to the Profession; the world's scientists, in their own words, on Michael Mann, his hockey stick, and their damage to science."

Monday, August 14, 2017

Charlottesville Police Didn't Stand Down; They Sided With Antifa

Reports are coming out indicating that the C'ville police broke up the Rightists into small groups and pushed them into antifa. The police have stood down in past riots, allowing antifa to attack the Other, but this time they apparently actively participated, on the side of antifa rioters.

The peaceful night torch march was hailed as a success due to the absence of antifa - who didn't know about it.

So the peaceful nature of the demonstrators was fully demonstrated. The police and antifa changed all that the next day.

The tactics will have to change, as historical markers of Democrat Racism are being deleted from history. There is no telling when gunfire will breakout and the civil war will become official if it is not already. When that happens, I suspect that demonstrations will cease for the most part, and 4th generation warfare will become common.

Guerrilla warfare was effective, even in the first Civil War. This time the entire nation might be involved since every institution is infected, as Google has demonstrated. I think that it is possible that guerrillas might operate against the Deep State, too. But the black-clad basement dwellers will be either ignored into oblivion or doxxed and eradicated early on.

It's hard to imagine a scenario wherein the Left can be persuaded to leave the rest of us alone.

The Battle for the USA is Defined and Joined

Vox Day
Tit-for-tat is now in order. Do you have an employee who supports Black Lives Matter on Twitter? Fire them. Do you have any employees who are SJWs? Fire them. Anyone who puts rainbows on Facebook? Fire them.

If James Damore and Cole White can be fired for their beliefs, so can everyone else. Once a tactic has been legitimized by the Left, don't hesitate to use it. The Left has made it very clear that peaceful coexistence is no longer possible, so stop trying to coexist with them.

This development isn't something to fear. Why are they doing this now? Because they are terrified of the gathering momentum and they are desperate to somehow stop it.

Meanwhile, (((Ben Shapiro))) is still lying about the Alt-Right. It is correct to say that it includes white nationalists, but it is blatantly false to claim that it is entirely white nationalists, or that it is a white supremacist philosophy.

The fact that our enemies feel the need to lie about us and misrepresent our views is one of the strongest indicators that our views are convincing and catching on with more and more former conservatives and libertarians and liberals alike.

[Emphasis Added]
How can there be compromise when constitutional liberties are summarily suppressed? When Leftists define the traditional Liberal, Constitutional Other (somewhat gently called "Deplorables" last year) as NAZIs, coming to kill Leftists?

Note the irrational hysteria here:

Fake Rightists

I haven't had time to sort through the information carnage regarding the demonstrations at Charlotte. But if actual NAZIs were there, they are not on the Right; they are socialists. But they are likely anti-communist, too, so if they recognize the Democrat antifa and KKK as communist and confront them, then its socialists vs. socialists. As socialists they are mirror images of the antifa/KKK Democrat socialists.

My uninformed understanding is that the alt-Right had the permission to demonstrate, and the Leftists just showed up (illegally) to cause mayhem/bloodshed and blame it on the Other for being irritating to them. I could be wrong, but that's the way it usually works... Speech is violence and violence is speech, depending on who is doing it. The Left got the violence they wished for, and the nation now has to mourn the death of an uninvited counter protester, killed by a psycho with cats named after mass murderers. But I could be wrong, maybe the murderer is a legitimate Right Winger.

There will be more of this, and I predicted a bloody summer this year. I thought it would be more wide spread.

As an aside, I wonder how many of the Brownshirts are FBI undercovers... Maybe all but one?

Sunday, August 13, 2017

Find What You Do Well and Keep Doing It

Just When You Think We've Reached Peak Absurdity...

Traitor Chelsea Manning Won't Rule Out Run for Office

Leftist Lies and Fake News About the Google Memo

Lies jumped into the headlines almost immediately after the release of Damore's memo. Even though the memo is public now and available for anyone to read, apparently the Left depends upon their MSM to 'splain it to them. Or so the Leftist MSM seems to believe. Because the memo does not make the claims that much of (all of?) the MSM says it does. What it does do is to undercut the Victimhood meme, and to attribute the disproportionate population of males in tech to differences between males and females, and what it is that females actually want to do (apparently not that many want to code).

This thought fails the Left's narrative by declaring that [Victimhood Class: Women] is not perfectly equal in every aspect to [Oppressor Class: Men] (a heresy punishable by excommunication). It also presupposed, incorrectly, that science would be preferred over blind narrative, which was a naive view of the Leftist mind and emotional neediness.

The positions taken in the memo have been declared congruent with current science. No matter; the MSM has skewed the positions of the memos into unrecognizable false memes: blatant Lies.
FAKE NEWS: 4 Things The Google Manifesto DOESN’T Say That The Media Claim It Says
The mainstream media couldn't lower itself below its current status as digital sewage.

Google and Black Packing History

Great Moments in Google: "American Inventors"
Were ten out of twelve of the "greatest American inventors" really blacks? Google tells you so.
If you go to Google and type in American inventors you get back from Google pictures of the top American inventors of all time.

The #1 American inventor of all time is Lewis Howard Latimer, who, I just learned, worked with both Edison and Bell.

Thomas Edison is in 6th place and a well-tanned Alexander Graham Bell in 9th place, with ten black inventors rounding out the top dozen.

In the second dozen, Samuel Morse is 19th, Eli Whitney 20th, and Ben Franklin 23rd. Everybody else is black.

The Wright Brothers don’t make the top 50 American inventors, according to Google.
Everything is relative these days - especially history. If history is just the opinion of Google and Wikipedia, then history is lost, replaced by Marxist leverage.

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Poor AL - His New Movie Is Doing Poorly at the Box Office, Too

Global temperatures COOLER now than when Gore won Nobel Prize in 2007

AL GORE’S POOR TRACK RECORD - Chart by Meteorologist Joe Bastardi of Weatherbell Analytics. - An inconvenient truth: Global temps were warmer when Al Gore won the 2007 Nobel Prize than today, even after the 2015/16 super El Nino.

Memes, Cont'd

"Ridicule works"
Saul D. Alinsky



Democrats and Abortion

Democrat Campaign Spokeswoman Contradicts: ‘No Interest’ in Working with Pro-Life Democrats

OK, I think I'm getting it. To be a Democrat, you have to be a) Non-white; b) eugenicist.

We'll get this narrowed down in time. I'm thinking maybe c) no cis-males; d) no straights.

Interesting to watch; frightening to contemplate.

Hidden Non-Converence: The Rebels of Google

Rebels of Google

More Google employees are blowing the whistle about intimidation, discrimination, and dogma at the company following the firing of viewpoint diversity advocate James Damore.

Breitbart News’ interview series, Rebels of Google, has revealed an atmosphere of profound fear at the company, in which employees who challenge Google’s hyper-progressive narratives face bullying and ostracization from co-workers, and frequently find themselves added to blacklists aimed at destroying peoples’ careers both inside and outside Google.

Our last interviewee even described an incident in which someone was punched for expressing a contrary viewpoint.

In our latest interview, current Google employee (alias “Gordon”) reveals more stories of intolerance and dogma at the company. He describes senior managers at Google being on the “verge of tears” following Trump’s election win, “cult-like” diversity training sessions, and an autistic employee who was fired after questioning the idea of gender as a spectrum.

Every week, Google holds an end-of-week meeting with all its Mountain View employees called a “TGIF meeting” (Thank God It’s Friday). According to Gordon, the TGIF that followed Trump’s election victory was something to behold.
Go HERE for more.

Democrats and Race

When identity Marxism is the philosophy, and skin tone is the marker for identity, the most virulent skin tone identity will out. The white Leftists might have achieved their ultimate goal (hatred of western culture and whites) by enabling racism beyond mere invective. Not even ironically, it is served first against themselves. And rationally, whites who hate whites are too internally conflicted to survive anyway.

Will this result in BLM vs white Antifa? Hand me some popcorn...

Because the "socials" have gone full SJW, alternative sources have started to appear. Today's example is the Google-owned YouTube jackbooting of conservative sites. This was made clear on August 1 this year as the YouTube memo was released declaring that hate speech would be "restricted". Since then a number of Right leaning videos have been shut off or demonitized or both. The Google march against free speech is gathering speed.

Free speech is a human right which does NOT apply to corporations or their products. Google violates no laws in suppressing the use of their products in order to promote their worldview - only.

This also has occurred in other venues, such as Wikipedia where Leftist censors prowl and rewrite history to suit their fancy. Google itself censors searches and accesses according to the demands of totalitarians such as China and Muslim nations. Google has suppressed search results for political purposes.

As they say, necessity is a mother. In the war on free speech, mother has spawned alternatives. The alternative to Wikipedia is Infogalactic. The alternative to Google search is DuckDuckGo.

The alternative to YouTube doesn't exist quite yet, but the effort has begun. Rebel Media is pursuing an App approach for creating user video-players which would be open and not censored, at least in terms of speech. (streaming of rapes and murders of course can't be tolerated, one would suppose). This effort has just begun since the Google threat of Aug 1 against speech on YouTube.

And they need cash. Seriously - if you can and are motivated by freedom, donate, even if just a little. I certainly intend to support this breakaway from the Google dynasty of totalitarianism and mind control.

Because this blog is on the Google application, there will come a time, possibly, when all anti-Leftist thought will have been detected by Google bots, and will be forced onto independent platforms, and I will have to find an alternative in order to just blog. Meantime, please support the alternatives which have emerged as free speech sites.

Friday, August 11, 2017

BREAKING: The War of Treason on Trump as Seen From Inside the Deep State

The most damaging memo to emerge from the lair of the Left: The design of the War on Trump, as it  is implemented within the US Government NSA: 

[.pdf file is HERE]

Here’s the Memo That Blew Up the NSC 

Fired White House staffer argued "deep state" attacked Trump administration because the president represents a threat to cultural Marxist memes, globalists, and bankers.

May 2017

BACKGROUND. The Trump administration is suffering under withering information campaigns designed

to first undermine, then de legitimize and ultimately remove the President. Possibly confusing these

attacks with an elevated interplay of otherwise normal D.C. partisan infighting and adversarial media

relations, the White House response to these campaigns reflects a political advocacy mindset that it is

intensely reactive, severely under-inclusive and dangerously inadequate to the threat. If action is not

taken to re-scope and respond to these hostile campaigns very soon, the administration risks implosion

and subsequent early departure from the White House.

This is not politics as usual but rather political warfare at an unprecedented level that is openly engaged

in the direct targeting of a seated president through manipulation of the news cycle. It must be

recognized on its own terms so that immediate action can be taken. At its core, these campaigns run on

multiple lines of effort, serve as the non-violent line of effort of a wider movement, and execute political

warfare agendas that reflect cultural Marxist outcomes. The campaigns operate through narratives.

Because the hard left is aligned with lslamist organizations at local (ANTI FA working with Muslim

Brotherhood doing business as MSA and CAIR), national (ACLU and BLM working with CAIR and MPAC)

and international levels (OIC working with OSCE and the UN), recognition must given to the fact that

they seamlessly interoperate at the narrative level as well. In candidate Trump, the opposition saw a

threat to the "politically correct" enforcement narratives they've meticulously laid in over the past few

decades. In President Trump, they see a latent threat to continue that effort to ruinous effect and their

retaliatory response reflects this fear.

INTRODUCTION. Responding to relentless personal assaults on his character, candidate Trump

identified the players and the strategy:

• "The establishment and their media enablers will control over this nation through means that

are very well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a

xenophobe, and morally deformed." - President Trump, Oct 2016

Culturally conditioned to limit responses to such attacks as yet another round in the on-going drone

from diversity and multicultural malcontents, these broadsides are discounted as political correctness

run amuck. However, political correctness is a weapon against reason and critical thinking. This weapon

functions as the enforcement mechanism of diversity narratives that seek to implement cultural

Marxism. Candidate Trump's rhetoric in the campaign not only cut through the Marxist narrative, he did

so in ways that were viscerally comprehensible to a voting bloc that then made candidate Trump the

president; making that bloc self-aware in the process. President Trump is either the candidate he ran as,

or he is nothing.

Recognizing in candidate Trump an existential threat to cultural Marxist memes that dominate the

prevailing cultural narrative, those that benefit recognize the threat he poses and seek his destruction.

For this cabal, Trump must be destroyed. Far from politics as usual, this is a political warfare effort that

seeks the destruction of a sitting president. Since Trump took office, the situation has intensified to crisis

level proportions. For those engaged in the effort, especially those from within the "deep state" or

permanent government apparatus, this raises clear Title 18 (legal) concerns.


The Opposition.

While opposition to President Trump manifests itself through political warfare memes

centered on cultural Marxist narratives, this hardly means that opposition is limited to Marxists as

conventionally understood. Having become the dominant cultural meme, some benefit from it while

others are captured by it; including "deep state" actors, globalists, bankers, lslamists, and establishment

Republicans. Through the campaign, candidate Trump tapped into a deep vein of concern among many

citizens that America is at risk and is slipping away. Globalists and lslamists recognize that for their

visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed.

Atomization of society must also occur at the individual level; with attacks directed against all levels of

group and personal identity. Hence the sexism, racism and xenophobia memes. As a Judea-Christian

culture, forced inclusion of post-modern notions of tolerance is designed to induce nihilistic

contradictions that reduce all thought, all faith, all loyalties to meaninglessness. Group rights based on

sex or ethnicity are a direct assault on the very idea of individual human rights and natural law around

which the Constitution was framed. "Transgender acceptance" memes attack at the most basic level by

denying a person the right to declare the biological fact of one's sex. When a population has 2 + 2 = 5

imposed on it, there are many that benefit:

Mainstream Media -The principle mechanism for implementing narratives.

The Academy- Academia has served as a principle counter-state node for some time and

remains a key conduit for creating future adherents to cultural Marxist narratives and their

derivative worldview.

The Deep State - The successful outcome of cultural Marxism is a bureaucratic state beholden

to no one, certainly not the American people . With no rule of law considerations outside those

that further deep state power, the deep state truly becomes, as Hegel advocated, god

bestriding the earth.

Global Corporatists & Bankers - Exploitation of populations, unfettered by national protections

and notions of personal morality and piety.

Democratic Leadership - The democratic leadership has been a counter-state enabler that

executes, sustains, and protects cultural Marxist programs of action and facilitates the

relentless expansion of the deep state.

Republican Leadership - More afraid of being accused of being called a racist, sexist,

homophobe or lslamophobe than of failing to enforce their oaths to "support and defend the

Constitution," the Republican Establishment accepts and enforces cultural Marxist memes

within its own sphere of operations. In doing so, knowingly or not, it becomes an agent of that.

These "conservatives" become increasingly indistinguishable from their democratic counterparts

save that they misrepresent themselves to their constituents . Lacking the discernment to

recognize their situation, they will work with globalists, corporatists, and the international

financial interests and will likewise service the deep state. These establishment Republicans are

the hard left's designated defeat mechanism in the destruction of the old regime as well as the

American ideal.1 Because candidate Trump publicly exposed them for their duplicitous

activities, they are at risk as long as Trump can turn on them and are, therefore, bitter foes.

Candidate Trump's success remains an ongoing existential threat to establishment Republicans.

1 For more information on how influence operations of the former Soviet Union targeted leading conservative groups and individuals in order to bring them into line with cultural Marxist narratives. See Link here: ?v=YzZhqeLRIMo

lslamists - Isla mists ally with cultural Marxist because, as far back as the 1980s, they properly

assessed that the hard left has a strong chance of reducing Western civilization to its benefit.

Having co-opted post-modern narratives as critical points, Isla mists deploy these narrative to

strategically blind and then control US decision makers. This is by design and purposeful. "By

their own hands!" has been the declared strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood since 1991. This

strategy seeks to divide American society against itself with the forced imposition of Isla mist

objectives on one half of American society by the other half. Once a society has been effectively

atomized, the population will have lost its faith in the old order, detest those who reduced it,

and divide along the lines of narrative adherence. This is the intended outcome of hostile

information cum political warfare campaigns and today we see their effects on American


Complicating the current situation, many close to the president have pushed him off his message

when he was candidate Trump thus alienating him from his base thereby isolating him in the process.

When President Trump is not candidate Trump, he becomes dangerously exposed. While the base

that elected candidate Trump identified with his vision, they are only Trump's insofar as he holds to

the vision that made him president.

Political Warfare Attacks -A Primer. As used here, "political warfare" does not concern activities

associated with the American political process but rather exclusively refers to political warfare as

understood by the Maoist Insurgency model. 2 Political warfare is one of the five components of

a Maoist insurgency. Maoist methodologies employ synchronized violent and non-violent actions

that focus on mobilization of individuals and groups to action. This approach envisions the direct

use of non-violent

operational arts and tactics as elements of combat power. In Maoist insurgencies, the formation of a

counter-state is essential to seizing state power. Functioning as a hostile competing state acting within

an existing state, it has an alternate infrastructure. Political warfare operates as one of the activities of

the "counter-state" and is primarily focused on the resourcing and mobilization of the counter state or

the exhaustion and demobilization of the targeted political movement. Political warfare methods can

be implemented at strategic, operational, or tactical levels of operation.

Political warfare is warfare. Strategic information campaigns designed to delegitimize through

disinformation arise out of non-violent lines of effort in political warfare regimes. They principally

operate through narratives. Because the left is aligned with lslamist organizations at local, national and

international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through

coordinated synchronized interactive narratives.

Cultural Marxism - A Primer.

While the attacks on President Trump arise out of political warfare

considerations based on non-kinetic lines of effort (as discussed below), they operate in a battle-space

prepared, informed and conditioned by cultural Marxist drivers. In practical terms, the political warfare

assault on President Trump cannot be separated from the cultural Marxist narratives that drive them.

From an operational preparation of the environment perspective, President Trump is operating in a

battle-space that reflects the left's vision.

2 This discussion relies on Thomas A. Marks' treatment of the Maoist model as discussed in Maoist People's War in

Post-Vietnam Asia (Bangkok, Thailand: White Lotus Press, 2007), 1-14. Hereafter "Thomas A. Marks, Maoist

People's War."

As used in this discussion, cultural Marxism relates to programs and activities that arise out of Gramsci

Marxism, Fabian Socialism and most directly from the Frankfurt School. The Frankfurt strategy

deconstructs societies through attacks on culture by imposing a dialectic that forces unresolvable

contradictions under the rubric of critical theory. The result is induced nihilism, a belief in everything

that is actually the belief in nothing.

That post-modern (diversity/multiculturalism) narratives seeks to implement cultural Marxist objectives

can be demonstrated by reference to founding Frankfurt School theorist Herbert Marcuse's repurposing

of the term tolerance. In a 1965 ~ Marcuse defined tolerance as intolerance; said it can be

implemented through undemocratic means to stop chauvinism (xenophobia), racism, discrimination;

and should be extended to the left while denied to the right:

• "The realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and

the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed."

• "Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the

people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority

could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently

undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and

movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion,

or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc." (8-9)

• "Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from

the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance: ... it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion

and propaganda, of deed as well as of word." (12)

It is through such post-modern constructs that interoperable narratives are established among various

left-wing groups as well as between them and Isla mist groups at all levels. For example, from the 2001

Conference of Foreign Ministers at Bamako, Mali, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) declared

its commitment to fight racism and xenophobia and then declared lslamophobia a "contemporary form

of racism":

• In this context, the World Conference urges all states ... take all necessary measures to combat hatred, discrimination, intolerance

and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

particularly against Islam

• Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance which display an increasing trend, in their most subtle and

contemporary forms, constitute a violation of human rights. 3. Contemporary forms of racism are based on discrimination and

disparagement on a cultural, rather than biological basis. In this content, the increasing trend of lslamophobia, as a distinct form of

xenophobia in non-Muslim societies is very alarming.

That the OIC made these claims as part of its planned inputs to the United Nation's "Third World

Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance" further

demonstrates the coordinated and interoperable nature of these narratives at international levels in

international forums.

As cultural Marxist narratives intensify, they are to be further operationalized in the form of hate speech

narratives. Hate speech narratives are non-random, coordinated, and fully interoperable escalations of

cultural Marxist memes. Key international players include the European Union, the UN, and the OSCE,

the OIC and the International Muslim Brotherhood. Hate speech memes are structured, coordinated,

and implemented through these same international forums. They involve close coordination with media

and social media and include the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) narratives. David Shipler's book

Freedom of Speech provides a road map for how hate speech narratives are to be structured, deployed

and enforced.

Battlespace. These attack narratives are pervasive, full spectrum and institutionalized at all levels. They

operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media, and are entrenched at the upper

levels of the bureaucracies and within the foreign policy establishment. They inform the entertainment

industry from late night monologues, to situation comedies, to television series memes, to movie

themes. The effort required to direct this capacity at President Trump is little more than a programming

decision to do so. The cultural Marxist narrative is fully deployed, pervasive, full spectrum and ongoing.

Regarding the president, attacks have become a relentless 24/7 effort.

While there is certainly a Marxist agenda and even lslamist motivations that must be seriously

addressed in their own right, these motivations alone seem inadequate to explain the scope and

magnitude of the effort directed against the president. The economic drivers behind the Marxist and

Isla mist ideologues are enormously influential and seek to leverage these ideological movements for

their own self interests. While beyond the actual scope of this document, the benefactors of these

political movements include; Urban Real Estate who depend greatly on immigrant tenants, International

Banking who seeks to maintain US debtor status so as to control the application of American power, and

elements of the business sector that depend upon immigrant labor or government infrastructure. The

overall objective of these economic forces is the forced urbanization of the populace, thereby

necessitating a larger, more powerful government. In summary, this is a form of population control by

certain business cartels in league with cultural Marxists/corporatists/lslamists who will leverage Islamic

terrorism threats to justify the creation of a police state.

Adversary Campaign Plan. Political Warfare has been described as "propaganda in battledress." 3 The

effort directed at President Trump is executed along one overt, as well as two covert, lines of effort:

• The overt line of effort is PUBLICITY. Publicity is the straightforward projection of a case that

builds a picture in the audience's mind designed to garner support. It is facts without context

and information the adversary wants the audience to possess that creates an impression and

sets conditions. It seeks to establish good will and receptiveness to additional inputs.

• There are two covert lines of effort:


o Propaganda is the deliberate direction, even manipulation, of information to secure a

definite outcome. It is an attempt to direct the thinking of the recipient, without his

conscious collaboration, into predetermined channels that are established in the

Publicity line of effort. It is the unwitting conditioning of the recipient by devious

methods with an ulterior motive that seeks to move them incrementally over time into

greater belief and acceptance of message transmitted in the Publicity line of effort.

o Infiltration and subversion operate internal to the targeted organization in order to

inform, target, coordinate, and amplify the effects of the publicity and propaganda.

Both operate to gather intelligence, obstruct legitimate courses of action, provide inside

information, and leak sensitive information that undermines the leadership and

suppresses the morale of friendly elements.

3 "Political Warfare Executive - The Meaning, Techniques and Methods of Political Warfare," His Britannic

Majesty's Government, London, 1942, 5.

o Infiltration of political and social groups within a target state is done for the purpose of extending counterstate

influence and control. The endgame is concealed and may involve illicit activities.

o Subversion undermines or detaches the loyalties of significant political and social groups within the target

state and transfers political and/or ideological loyalties to the counter-state. As the counter-state forms, a

counter-elite of influential individual and key leaders within the target state will later facilitate the legitimacy

and permanency of the new regime.

Political warfare employs both publicity and propaganda. It recognizes no intrinsic virtue in the news but

rather envisions it as a mechanism to exploit and build up support. From a political warfare perspective,

control of the news cycle is the most potent means of attracting and building up a favorable audience.

As it relates to the news cycle, publicity and propaganda can be merged to form a "pseudo-publicity"

that is presented as news in furtherance of sustaining pseudo-realities maintained by cultural Marxist

memes. Pseudo-publicity treatment of President Trump dominates the news cycle. The current

campaign against President Trump operates in the following manner:

The Meta Narrative. Meta narratives seeks to delegitimize President Trump, his administration, and the

vision of America he projected as a candidate. With cultural Marxist memes serving as the backdrop,

President Trump is to be relentlessly characterized as unfit through the use of supporting narratives

acting to move unwitting populations to belief in the meta narrative. Hence:

• "President Trump is illegitimate"

• "President Trump is corrupt"

• "President Trump is dishonest"

Note that the twitter accounts and mainstream media personalities pushing this narrative have seen

their audience numbers rise greatly in the past 6 months. This is a direct result of the supporting and

backdrop narratives channeling individuals to this meta-narrative.

Supporting Narratives. Meta-narratives are supported by an ongoing series supporting-narratives that

can be swapped out as circumstances warrant. It is important to recognize that these stories do not

have to be true, valid or accurate to serve their purpose. Over time, deserved or not, the cumulative

effect of these supporting narratives will result in a Trump fatigue. From a political warfare perspective,

President Trump's inability to meet this challenge will cast him as a weak failed leader. The current list

of supporting narratives include:

• "Russia hacked the election" – illegitimate

• "Obstruction of Justice" – corrupt

• "Hiding Collusion" – dishonest

• "Putin Puppet" – treasonous

Backdrop Narratives. The backdrop to the meta and supporting narratives are cultural Marxist memes

designed to sustain a general sense of loathing of President Trump and the America that elected him.


"[meta] President Trump is illegitimate, [supporting] he was elected because of Russian

hacking, [backdrop] and besides, he a racist, sexist xenophobe."

Adversaries utilize these interlocking narratives as a defensive political and information warfare screen

that silences critics and smears supporters of President Trump. When people in the media question the

behavior, actions and decisions of the Trump Administration's opponents, they are immediately said to

be "working for the Russians" or "supporting Russian propaganda." Individual Americans who support

the President are deemed "deplorable" and "racist."

End State.

Attacks on President Trump are not just about destroying him, but also about destroying the

vision of America that lead to his election. Those individuals and groups seeking the destruction of

President Trump actually seek to suffocate the vision of America that made him president. Hence, the

end state is not just a delegitimized, destabilized, immobilized and possibly destroyed presidency; but

also a demoralized movement composed of a large enough bloc to elect a president that subsequently

become self-aware of its own disenfranchisement.


The recent turn of events give rise to the observation that the defense of President Trump is the

defense of America. In the same way President Lincoln was surrounded by political opposition both

inside and outside of his wire, in both overt and covert forms, so too is President Trump. Had Lincoln

failed, so too would have the Republic. The administration has been maneuvered into a constant backpedal

by relentless political warfare attacks structured to force him to assume a reactive posture that

assures inadequate responses. The president can either drive or be driven by events; it's time for him to

drive them.